10 P&C Claims Case Management Best Practices for 2025

Nov 5, 2025

Discover 10 P&C claims case management best practices. Learn to centralize intake, automate triage, and accelerate resolutions with AI-powered strategies.

10 P&C Claims Case Management Best Practices for 2025

In the high-stakes world of property and casualty (P&C) claims, efficiency and accuracy are non-negotiable. Escalating claim complexity and heightened customer expectations demand a fundamental shift from traditional, siloed processes to a more structured, intelligent operational model. Implementing modern case management best practices is no longer a competitive advantage; it is an essential strategy for survival and growth.

This guide moves beyond theory to provide 10 actionable strategies designed to fundamentally transform your claims operations. We will explore how to centralize intake for a unified view of every case, automate initial triage with AI to prioritize critical claims, and enforce rigorously audit-ready processes that ensure compliance and consistency. The goal is to turn overwhelming caseloads into manageable, data-driven workflows.

By mastering these techniques, organizations can significantly reduce claim cycle times, lower operational costs, and improve adjuster productivity. More importantly, they can deliver the consistent, transparent, and fair outcomes that build customer trust and define market leadership. This listicle offers a clear roadmap to achieving that standard of excellence.

1. Person-Centered Care Planning

Person-centered care planning is a collaborative approach that shifts the focus from a standardized, one-size-fits-all process to one that honors the individual's unique needs, values, and goals. In P&C claims, this means moving beyond the claim file number and treating the claimant as an active partner in their own recovery and resolution journey. This approach is a cornerstone of effective case management best practices because it fosters trust, improves communication, and directly impacts outcomes.


Person-Centered Care Planning

The core principle, popularized by pioneers like Carl Rogers and organizations such as the Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, is that outcomes improve when the individual's autonomy is respected. For example, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ "Whole Health" system, a person-centered model, empowers veterans to take charge of their health, leading to better engagement and results. In claims, this could mean co-developing a rehabilitation plan that aligns with a claimant's personal and professional life rather than just a medical checklist.

How to Implement Person-Centered Planning

To apply this, case managers must actively listen and adapt. The goal is to understand the claimant's perspective on their recovery and what "resolution" truly means to them.

  • Use Motivational Interviewing: Employ open-ended questions to explore the claimant’s motivations and concerns about their recovery and claim process.

  • Co-create Action Plans: Work with the claimant to set achievable, meaningful milestones for their recovery or property restoration, not just for them.

  • Involve Support Systems: When appropriate and with consent, include family or other support networks in discussions to ensure a holistic approach to recovery.

  • Document Preferences Clearly: Ensure the claimant's specific goals and communication preferences are documented in the case file for all stakeholders to see, ensuring continuity and respect.

2. Comprehensive Assessment and Ongoing Reassessment

A comprehensive assessment is a foundational practice that involves a thorough initial evaluation of all facets of a claimant's situation, extending beyond the immediate loss. This is followed by systematic reassessment to adapt to changing circumstances. This is one of the most critical case management best practices because it ensures the action plan is built on a solid, holistic understanding of the claimant's reality, from underlying risks to available resources, preventing unforeseen barriers from derailing the claim's progress.

The principle is championed by organizations like the Case Management Society of America (CMSA) and the National Association of Social Workers, who advocate for a multi-dimensional view of a client’s needs. For instance, in complex workers' compensation claims, an initial assessment might uncover not just the physical injury but also psychosocial stressors like financial strain or lack of family support that could impede recovery. Regularly reassessing these factors allows the case manager to proactively adjust the strategy, ensuring the plan remains relevant and effective.

How to Implement Comprehensive Assessment

The goal is to create a dynamic, 360-degree view of the claim that evolves over time. This requires structured processes and the right tools to capture and act on new information.

  • Use Validated Assessment Tools: Employ standardized tools or create structured checklists to ensure all case managers consistently evaluate key areas like medical status, psychosocial barriers, and return-to-work potential.

  • Set Reassessment Triggers: Automate reminders in your case management system for periodic reassessments at key milestones, such as post-surgery or upon receipt of new medical evidence.

  • Incorporate Claimant Self-Assessment: Empower claimants by asking them to report their own progress, concerns, and goals. This provides valuable insights and enhances engagement.

  • Compare Against a Baseline: Use the initial assessment as a benchmark to measure progress. Demonstrating tangible improvement can motivate the claimant and validate the case strategy for stakeholders.

3. Effective Communication and Information Sharing

Effective communication is the lifeblood of successful claims resolution, serving as the foundation for trust, transparency, and coordinated action. This practice involves establishing clear, consistent, and culturally competent communication channels with all stakeholders, from claimants to legal teams and vendors. It also requires robust information-sharing protocols that ensure everyone has timely access to necessary data while rigorously protecting privacy, making it a critical component of case management best practices.


Effective Communication and Information Sharing

The importance of structured communication is highlighted by programs like TeamSTEPPS, originally developed for healthcare but widely applicable to the high-stakes environment of P&C claims. For instance, integrated claims teams using the SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation) protocol can convey urgent case updates concisely and accurately, reducing errors and delays. Similarly, a secure claimant portal, much like Mayo Clinic's patient portal, provides a central hub for messaging and document sharing, empowering claimants and streamlining interactions.

How to Implement Effective Communication

To build a framework for superior communication, case managers must be proactive and systematic. The goal is to eliminate ambiguity and ensure every stakeholder feels heard, informed, and respected.

  • Establish Communication Protocols: During intake, document the claimant’s preferred communication method and frequency. Set clear expectations for response times (e.g., within 24 hours).

  • Use Clarity-Checking Techniques: Employ the "teach-back" method to confirm a claimant understands complex information about their policy, deductible, or next steps in the claims process.

  • Centralize Documentation: Meticulously document all significant communications in the case record. This creates an audit-ready trail and ensures continuity if the case is transferred.

  • Schedule Regular Case Conferences: Hold routine interdisciplinary meetings with adjusters, legal counsel, and vendors to review complex cases, align on strategy, and resolve roadblocks.

4. Resource Coordination and Linkage

Resource coordination and linkage involves identifying and connecting claimants with the right services to address needs beyond the immediate scope of their claim. This proactive practice requires case managers to have a deep understanding of community resources, from medical specialists to vocational rehabilitation services. Effective coordination is a critical component of case management best practices because it removes barriers to recovery, reduces claim duration, and demonstrates a holistic commitment to the claimant’s well-being.


Resource Coordination and Linkage

This approach is championed by frameworks like the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Triple Aim, which emphasizes improving population health and patient experience. In claims, this could mean connecting an injured worker with a local transportation service to ensure they can attend physical therapy or linking a policyholder who lost their home with temporary housing resources. The goal is to actively facilitate connections, not just provide a list of phone numbers.

How to Implement Resource Coordination

To apply this, case managers must act as connectors, bridging the gap between the claimant's needs and available community supports. This requires both a robust knowledge base and proactive follow-through.

  • Build a Curated Resource Directory: Develop and maintain an updated guide of vetted local and national services, including contact information, eligibility criteria, and referral processes.

  • Establish Formal Partnerships: Create Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with frequently used organizations to streamline referrals and ensure clear communication channels.

  • Assist with Access: Help claimants overcome practical barriers by assisting with applications, explaining what to expect at appointments, and addressing issues like transportation or childcare.

  • Track and Follow Up: Follow up with both the claimant and the service provider within a week to confirm a successful connection was made and track referral outcomes to refine your resource network.

5. Caseload Management and Prioritization

Strategic caseload management is a foundational discipline for organizing and prioritizing claims to ensure high-quality attention is given where it's needed most. In P&C claims, this means moving beyond a "first-in, first-out" queue to a dynamic system that allocates resources based on complexity, severity, and urgency. This is a critical component of case management best practices because it prevents adjuster burnout, ensures equitable service, and accelerates the resolution of high-impact claims.

The core principle, reinforced by organizations like the Case Management Society of America, is that not all cases are equal in their demands. For instance, Medicare Advantage plans use Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk scores to assign case management intensity, ensuring those with complex health needs receive more support. Similarly, a claims department can use triage criteria to assign a complex, multi-party liability claim to a senior adjuster while a junior adjuster handles a straightforward glass claim, optimizing expertise and efficiency.

How to Implement Caseload Management and Prioritization

To apply this, managers must establish clear criteria for segmentation and empower adjusters with tools for daily focus. The goal is to create a sustainable workflow that addresses both urgent tasks and important, long-term case progression.

  • Conduct Regular Caseload Analysis: Quarterly, review caseloads across the team to identify imbalances in volume or complexity and reassign claims as needed.

  • Use a Prioritization Matrix: Implement a simple framework like the Eisenhower Matrix (urgent/important) for daily task management to focus on what truly drives claim resolution.

  • Establish Clear Triage Criteria: Define specific triggers (e.g., litigation potential, high-dollar reserves, specific injury types) that automatically route claims to specialized teams or senior staff.

  • Automate Routine Tasks: Leverage technology to handle administrative work like appointment reminders or status update requests, freeing up adjusters for high-value activities. Learn more about how modern AI tools can boost productivity on wamy.com.

6. Outcome Measurement and Quality Improvement

Outcome measurement and quality improvement transform case management from an activity-based function to a results-driven discipline. This practice involves systematically tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and identify opportunities for enhancement. A core component of case management best practices, this approach demonstrates value, ensures accountability, and guides continuous refinement of processes for better claimant outcomes.

The principles, championed by quality improvement pioneers like W. Edwards Deming and organizations such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, are centered on the "Plan-Do-Study-Act" cycle. In P&C claims, this means moving beyond just tracking activities like calls made or files touched. Instead, the focus shifts to measurable results, such as reduced claim cycle times, lower litigation rates, or improved claimant satisfaction scores. For example, a carrier could track the average cost of a specific injury type before and after implementing a new medical management protocol to prove its ROI.

How to Implement Outcome Measurement

Effective implementation requires a strategic, data-informed approach that focuses on what truly matters rather than tracking everything. The goal is to create a feedback loop that drives meaningful process improvements.

  • Select Meaningful Metrics: Instead of overwhelming your team, choose 5-7 impactful KPIs. Include both process measures (e.g., time to first contact) and outcome measures (e.g., return-to-work duration).

  • Leverage Technology: Use case management software to automate data collection and create visual dashboards. This simplifies tracking progress and helps identify trends. Discover more about the benefits of automated insurance claims processing.

  • Conduct Quality Reviews: Hold regular (e.g., quarterly) meetings with frontline case managers to review the data, discuss what’s working, and brainstorm solutions for areas needing improvement.

  • Celebrate Successes: Actively recognize and celebrate when the team meets or exceeds its quality improvement goals. This reinforces the value of the practice and boosts morale.

7. Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Team-Based Care

Interdisciplinary collaboration breaks down silos, uniting professionals from different disciplines to work cooperatively toward shared client goals. This approach recognizes that complex claims, especially those involving significant injury or property loss, require diverse expertise that no single professional can fully provide. This team-based care is a vital component of modern case management best practices because it leads to more comprehensive, holistic, and effective resolution strategies.

The value of this model is well-documented in healthcare through concepts like Patient-Centered Medical Homes and the World Health Organization's Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education. In a P&C claims context, this could involve a case manager, a medical expert, a vocational rehabilitation specialist, and a legal advisor collaborating on a complex workers' compensation claim to ensure all facets of the claimant’s recovery and return-to-work plan are addressed simultaneously.

How to Implement Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Success depends on structured communication and mutual respect for each professional's expertise. The goal is to create a unified front that supports the claimant and streamlines the claims process.

  • Establish Regular Team Huddles: Schedule brief, consistent meetings (e.g., weekly or bi-weekly) to review complex cases, share updates, and align on next steps.

  • Define Clear Roles and Responsibilities: Document who is responsible for each aspect of the case to prevent overlaps and ensure accountability.

  • Utilize a Shared Information System: Use a centralized platform where all team members can access real-time case notes, documents, and communication logs.

  • Create Collaborative Action Plans: Develop claim resolution plans that incorporate input and tasks from each discipline, ensuring a well-rounded and cohesive strategy.

8. Trauma-Informed Care Approach

A trauma-informed care approach is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma on an individual's life and well-being. In P&C claims, this means understanding that a catastrophic event like a house fire or serious car accident is not just a financial loss but a traumatic experience. This approach, integral to modern case management best practices, shifts the question from "What's wrong with you?" to "What happened to you?" to create a safer and more supportive claims process.

This model, promoted by organizations like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), emphasizes physical, psychological, and emotional safety. For example, health centers that screen for Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and provide trauma-informed primary care see better patient engagement. Similarly, a claims adjuster using this approach would recognize that a claimant's agitation may stem from trauma-induced stress, not uncooperativeness, and adjust their communication style accordingly.

How to Implement a Trauma-Informed Approach

To apply this, case managers must prioritize creating a secure environment that empowers the claimant and avoids re-traumatization. The goal is to build trust and help the claimant regain a sense of control.

  • Practice Active Empathy: Validate the claimant’s experiences and emotional responses without judgment, acknowledging the difficulty of their situation.

  • Maximize Choice and Control: Whenever possible, provide claimants with options regarding communication times, inspection schedules, or settlement methods to restore their sense of agency.

  • Ensure Transparency and Predictability: Clearly explain every step of the claims process, what to expect next, and why certain information is needed to reduce anxiety and uncertainty.

  • Create a Calming Environment: For in-person meetings, choose a quiet, private space. In all communications, use a calm tone and clear, simple language to foster a sense of safety.

9. Cultural Competence and Health Equity Focus

Cultural competence is the ability to understand, appreciate, and interact with people from cultures or belief systems different from one's own. In P&C claims, this means moving beyond simple awareness to actively addressing how a claimant's cultural, linguistic, or socioeconomic background impacts their recovery journey. This practice is essential for modern case management best practices because it dismantles barriers to care, builds profound trust, and promotes equitable outcomes for all claimants.

The importance of this approach is underscored by initiatives like the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS), which guide health organizations in providing equitable care. For example, a workers' compensation case manager might partner with a community health navigator from the injured worker's cultural community to ensure medical instructions are understood and followed. This proactive, culturally-informed support can significantly reduce recovery times and prevent misunderstandings that often delay claim resolutions.

How to Implement a Health Equity Focus

Applying this requires case managers to engage in ongoing learning and self-reflection to meet diverse claimant needs without making assumptions.

  • Ask, Don't Assume: Inquire directly and respectfully about a claimant's cultural background, communication preferences, and any specific needs or beliefs related to their recovery.

  • Use Professional Interpreters: For crucial conversations, always use certified medical interpreters rather than relying on family members, who may not be impartial or familiar with technical terminology.

  • Assess Health Literacy: Evaluate the claimant's understanding of their situation and adapt educational materials accordingly, using plain language and visual aids to improve comprehension.

  • Partner with Community Resources: Connect with cultural brokers and community organizations that can provide specialized support and build a bridge between the claimant and the claims process.

10. Evidence-Based Practice and Clinical Decision-Making

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a systematic approach that grounds case management decisions in the best available research, combined with professional expertise and the claimant's values. For P&C claims, this means moving beyond intuition or tradition and adopting strategies proven to be effective for specific situations, like managing complex injury recovery or mental health components of a claim. This is a crucial component of modern case management best practices because it ensures interventions are not just well-intentioned but are also validated by data, leading to more predictable and successful outcomes.

This approach was pioneered in medicine by figures like Dr. David Sackett and is promoted by organizations like the Cochrane Collaboration, which produce systematic reviews of research. In claims, this translates to using validated assessment tools, like the PHQ-9 for depression screening in a workers' compensation case, or adopting proven models like the Care Transitions Intervention to reduce hospital readmissions and associated costs after a serious injury.

How to Implement Evidence-Based Practice

To apply EBP, case managers must become adept at finding, evaluating, and applying relevant research to their daily work, ensuring the chosen methods align with the claimant's unique circumstances.

  • Utilize Clinical Practice Guidelines: Refer to guidelines from reputable sources (e.g., SAMHSA, NICE) to inform your approach to common claim scenarios, such as managing chronic pain or PTSD.

  • Leverage Validated Screening Tools: Employ evidence-based instruments for assessments to accurately identify risks and needs, ensuring the right resources are deployed early.

  • Stay Informed on Current Research: Subscribe to industry journals or professional associations that distill and share the latest findings relevant to claims and recovery management.

  • Measure and Evaluate Outcomes: When implementing an evidence-based model, track key metrics to confirm its effectiveness within your specific claimant population and make data-driven adjustments.

Case Management: 10 Best Practices Comparison

Practice

Implementation Complexity

Resource Requirements

Expected Outcomes

Ideal Use Cases

Key Advantages

Main Limitations

Person-Centered Care Planning

Moderate–High (culture change, collaborative workflows)

Training programs, assessment tools, documentation systems

↑ engagement, adherence, satisfaction; tailored care plans

Long-term care, mental health, chronic disease management

Empowers clients; personalized plans; stronger therapeutic relationships

Time‑intensive; challenging with cognitive impairment; requires substantial training

Comprehensive Assessment & Ongoing Reassessment

High (multi-domain evaluations, standardized tools)

Validated assessment instruments, trained staff, time for reassessments

Accurate baseline, earlier intervention, better resource allocation

New intakes, high‑risk or complex cases, care transitions

Identifies hidden needs; supports evidence‑based decisions; measurable baselines

Time‑consuming; assessment fatigue; may reveal needs beyond resources

Effective Communication & Information Sharing

Moderate (protocols, privacy controls)

Secure messaging/EHR, interpreters, templates, staff training

Reduced errors, improved coordination, better adherence

Transitions of care, interdisciplinary teams, high‑complexity cases

Builds trust; reduces miscommunication; timely interventions

Privacy/regulatory constraints; tech barriers; risk of information overload

Resource Coordination & Linkage

Moderate (community mapping and follow‑up)

Resource databases, partner MOUs, staff time for warm handoffs

Improved service connection, reduced duplication, cost‑effectiveness

Addressing social determinants, complex service navigation needs

Ensures clients connect to services; strengthens community partnerships

Resource variability by location; complex eligibility; maintenance burden

Caseload Management & Prioritization

Moderate (acuity scoring, triage systems)

Acuity tools, workload analytics, scheduling protocols

Prioritized attention to highest‑need clients; reduced burnout

High‑volume settings, agencies with diverse acuity levels

Equitable work distribution; improved efficiency and staff wellbeing

Lower‑acuity clients may be deprioritized; scoring can be subjective

Outcome Measurement & Quality Improvement

High (data collection, analytics, QI methods)

Data systems, analytics capacity, KPI dashboards, staff time

Demonstrable effectiveness, continuous improvement, ROI evidence

Programs requiring evaluation, funded initiatives, system redesign

Data‑driven decisions; identifies improvement opportunities; accountability

Data burden; attribution issues; requires investment in analytics

Interdisciplinary Collaboration & Team‑Based Care

High (coordination across disciplines)

Shared documentation, protected meeting time, leadership support

Holistic care, reduced fragmentation, better problem‑solving

Complex medical/social needs, geriatrics, palliative care

Diverse expertise; improved coordination; reduced conflicting recommendations

Scheduling difficulties; potential role confusion; needs strong leadership

Trauma‑Informed Care Approach

High (organizational policy and practice shifts)

Staff training, environment modifications, supportive policies

Reduced re‑traumatization, better engagement, safer care environments

Behavioral health, shelters, child welfare, services for trauma survivors

Increases safety and trust; explains behaviors; improves engagement

Resource‑intensive to implement; emotional burden for staff; slower processes

Cultural Competence & Health Equity Focus

Moderate (ongoing learning and adaptation)

Interpreter services, training, diverse hiring, community partnerships

Improved access and engagement for diverse populations; reduced disparities

Diverse communities, equity initiatives, community‑based programs

Enhances trust and communication; culturally adapted interventions

Risk of stereotyping; requires continuous education and resources

Evidence‑Based Practice & Clinical Decision‑Making

Moderate–High (literature appraisal, adaptation)

Access to research, training, implementation support, guidelines

Better outcomes using proven interventions; professional accountability

Clinical decision points, program selection, practice improvement

Uses proven methods; reduces ineffective practices; supports credibility

Limited evidence in some areas; time‑intensive to stay current; adaptation challenges

Unlocking Peak Performance with Intelligent Case Management

Mastering P&C claims handling in today's complex landscape requires more than just processing paperwork; it demands a strategic, intelligent approach. The ten case management best practices we've explored provide the essential framework for transforming your operations. From establishing person-centered care plans and ensuring comprehensive assessments to fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and maintaining a sharp focus on cultural competence, each principle is a crucial component of a high-functioning claims unit.

The common thread weaving through these strategies is a fundamental shift from reactive problem-solving to proactive, structured, and data-driven resolution. Implementing these best practices consistently ensures that every claim journey is managed with precision, empathy, and efficiency. This not only accelerates resolution times but also builds a foundation of trust with policyholders, reduces the risk of costly litigation, and establishes a clear, audit-ready trail for every decision made.

From Principles to Performance

Adopting these concepts is the first step, but operationalizing them at scale is where true transformation occurs. Manually enforcing consistent communication protocols, ensuring ongoing reassessments, and meticulously coordinating resources across a high volume of claims can overwhelm even the most dedicated teams. This is where the power of intelligent automation becomes indispensable. The goal is to embed these case management best practices directly into your daily workflows, making excellence the standard, not the exception.

Here are the pivotal takeaways for your team:

  • Structure is Your Strategic Advantage: Centralized intake, standardized assessments, and consistent communication aren't just administrative tasks; they are the bedrock of efficient claims resolution.

  • Data-Informed is Audit-Ready: By focusing on evidence-based practice and outcome measurement, you create a defensible, transparent process that satisfies regulatory requirements and internal audits.

  • Technology is the Force Multiplier: Leveraging AI and automation is no longer a luxury but a necessity for managing caseloads effectively, triaging information accurately, and freeing up adjusters to focus on complex decision-making and negotiation.

Ultimately, the journey toward elite claims management is about building a system that is both robust and responsive. It’s about creating an environment where adjusters are empowered with the right information at the right time, enabling them to make the best possible decisions. This systematic approach doesn't just lower operational costs; it elevates the role of your claims team from a cost center to a strategic asset that drives customer loyalty and protects the bottom line. By committing to these principles, you are investing in a future of unparalleled efficiency, accuracy, and superior outcomes.

Ready to see how AI can embed these case management best practices directly into your claims workflow? Discover how Wamy centralizes intake, automates document triage, and provides an audit-ready workspace to help you resolve claims up to 4x faster. Explore the platform at Wamy and unlock a new level of operational excellence.

© 2025 Wamy. All rights reserved.